dc.date.accessioned | 2013-03-12T12:42:30Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-10T22:30:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | en_US |
dc.date.submitted | 2010-04-26 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Fandrem, Eirin. Instrumenter for identifisering av individer i prodromalfase for psykose. Prosjektoppgave, University of Oslo, 2010 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/29631 | |
dc.description.abstract | Prospective identification of individuals at risk of psychosis (“prodromal state”) is necessary for early intervention. This paper gives a comprehensive overview of the different prospective assessment instrument used today and a discussion of their role in the diagnostic process. This paper describes 7 diagnostic instruments and 6 screening instruments. Most of the instruments are based on identification in a help-seeking, symptomatic patient group, referred to the different clinics because of suspicion of prodromal symptoms, but there are also made attempts of screening in a broader symptomatic patient group or in the general population since evidence show that only a portion of the individuals with increased risk seek help for mental problems in the early state. A diagnostic approach based on attenuate positive symptoms gives an annual transition rate varying between 9 % and 54 % in a help-seeking patient group, depending on instrument used and time to follow-up. The most used instruments likelihood ratios are between 2 and 3. The high transition rates in the studies may be partly due enrichment strategies through selectively filtering at-risk individuals out over a range of consecutive referral processes. Today none of the instruments have high enough specificity to be applied to the general population because of high false-positive rate. But screening with an instrument with high sensitivity in a help-seeking patient group, e.g. patients in general practice or clients of counselling services etc., to select individuals for a more detailed risk assessment, may be cost-effective and increase the overall sensitivity.
This paper also gives a discussion whether prodromal state of psychosis should be included as a diagnosis in DSM-V. | eng |
dc.language.iso | nob | en_US |
dc.subject | psykiatri | |
dc.title | Instrumenter for identifisering av individer i prodromalfase for psykose | en_US |
dc.type | Master thesis | en_US |
dc.date.updated | 2010-05-28 | en_US |
dc.creator.author | Fandrem, Eirin | en_US |
dc.subject.nsi | VDP::757 | en_US |
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitation | info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Fandrem, Eirin&rft.title=Instrumenter for identifisering av individer i prodromalfase for psykose&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2010&rft.degree=Prosjektoppgave | en_US |
dc.identifier.urn | URN:NBN:no-24615 | en_US |
dc.type.document | Prosjektoppgave | en_US |
dc.identifier.duo | 101635 | en_US |
dc.contributor.supervisor | Ann Færden | en_US |
dc.identifier.fulltext | Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/29631/3/Prosjekt-Fandrem.pdf | |