Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T11:14:26Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitted2010-05-13en_US
dc.identifier.citationCanovic, Amar. Bosnia and Herzegovina 1990. Masteroppgave, University of Oslo, 2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/23259
dc.description.abstractThe dissolution of the League of Communists of Yugoslavia in January 1990 left the multi-ethnic republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina in a difficult position. This thesis is presenting the political situation that emerged in Bosnia and Herzegovina after the League of Communists of Yugoslavia dissolved to the end of the first democratic election held in November 1990. The focus is put on various actors’ vision: what sort of Bosnia and Herzegovina they wanted and what was possible to arrange. Many feared that importation of nationalism from Serbia and Croatia could lead to disastrous consequences and that this republic might even be carved up. On the other hand there were those who believed that Bosnians-Herzegovinian’s would reject the nationalist doctrine and continue fostering the notion of “brotherhood and unity”. Democratic elections already held in Slovenia and Croatia in the spring months provided regime change with nationalist colouring. In Serbia the nationalist doctrine had replaced the communist one in the mid-1980s. All of this had enormous impact on the Bosnian-Herzegovinian society. When it was clear that mono-ethnic parties could register and participate in the election, the fear that Bosnia and Herzegovina would follow the path already seen in neighbouring republics became even greater. The outcome of the election result brought a new political elite in power: one that was of anti-communist approach. The three largest mono-ethnic parties -the Party of Democratic Action, Serb Democratic Party and Croatian Democratic Union- formed a coalition. They assured the Bosnian-Herzegovinian citizenry that they could work together and thus excluded the possibility of a civil war. However, although they managed to divide the power between themselves after the election their coalition was short-lived since they differed in their view of what status Bosnia and Herzegovina should have in the Yugoslav context, as later events showed.eng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleBosnia and Herzegovina 1990 : from communism to pluralismen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2012-12-07en_US
dc.creator.authorCanovic, Amaren_US
dc.date.embargoenddate10000-01-01
dc.rights.termsDette dokumentet er ikke elektronisk tilgjengelig etter ønske fra forfatter. Tilgangskode/Access code Aen_US
dc.rights.termsforeveren_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::070en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Canovic, Amar&rft.title=Bosnia and Herzegovina 1990&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2010&rft.degree=Masteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-25002en_US
dc.type.documentMasteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.duo102597en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorÅsmund Egge og Svein Mønneslanden_US
dc.identifier.bibsys10231473xen_US
dc.rights.accessrightsclosedaccessen_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/23259/1/MicrosoftxWordx-xBosniaxandxHerzegovinax1990.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata