Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T11:03:32Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T11:03:32Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.date.submitted2010-05-07en_US
dc.identifier.citationHødnebø, Ingrid. Social Justice and Deliberative Politics. Masteroppgave, University of Oslo, 2010en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/22863
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis the primary task has been to explore the potentials in Martha Nussbaum’s capabilities approach, especially in terms of how she balances norms requiring respect for cultural diversity and individual choice with the need to challenge the effects of unjust social power. I find in Nussbaum’s approach a good alternative to others, such as utilitarian welfare theories and Rawls’s justice as fairness theory. Still, it could be improved by the addition of justificatory and, hence, procedural resources. In this respect, I argue that a normative grounding in a Habermasian model of deliberative politics would be the best alignment.eng
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.titleSocial Justice and Deliberative Politics : Why Martha Nussbaum's Capabilities Approach Needs a Deliberative Proceduralism as Normative Groundingen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2011-02-18en_US
dc.creator.authorHødnebø, Ingriden_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::340en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Hødnebø, Ingrid&rft.title=Social Justice and Deliberative Politics&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2010&rft.degree=Masteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-25250en_US
dc.type.documentMasteroppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.duo102325en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorArne Johan Vetlesen og Cathrine Holsten_US
dc.identifier.bibsys111600057en_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/22863/1/MasteroppgavenxklarxforxDUO.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata