Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T09:57:26Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T09:57:26Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.citationTsygankova, Marina. Developing mechanisms for pollution standards. Hovedoppgave, University of Oslo, 2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/17344
dc.description.abstractDespite the complex environmental regulation system established during the last ten years environmental situation in Russia tends to be negative. The main reason of Russian environmental regulation inefficiency is enforcement and monitoring problems. Russian enterprises have little incentives to follow regulation. Environmental regulation has been disregarded during Soviet economy. Now when economical and political situation is unstable environmental concerns are still not on the top of government agenda. Regulating environmental agencies don t get enough resources from government for sufficient monitoring and inspections of polluters. Generally low fines for violation of environmental requirement make situation worse. Then task to find an efficient way that could enforce enterprises to comply with pollution is important. A mechanism of enforcement pollution standards that could be appropriate in Russian circumstances when pollution monitoring is low and violation fines are restricted is presented in this paper. The main analysis developed here is based on models of Harrington (1988) and Raymond (1999) that consider the state-dependent enforcement mechanism when violation fines are restricted. In this mechanism fines and inspection rates differ depending on the outcomes of last inspection. Such mechanism as proved gives enterprises extra incentives to comply with pollution regulation. The model of Harrington (1998) and its asymmetric information consideration by Raymond (1999) is extended and conditions when state-dependent enforcement is preferable to static (state-independent) enforcement are derived in the paper. If in a region concentration of firms with high marginal compliance costs is higher than concentration of firms with low marginal compliance costs then state-dependent enforcement is preferable. Applicability the state-dependent enforcement mechanism to pollution standards regulation in Russia is discussed.nor
dc.language.isonoben_US
dc.titleDeveloping mechanisms for pollution standards : the case of russiaen_US
dc.typeMaster thesisen_US
dc.date.updated2003-07-04en_US
dc.creator.authorTsygankova, Marinaen_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::210en_US
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&rft.au=Tsygankova, Marina&rft.title=Developing mechanisms for pollution standards&rft.inst=University of Oslo&rft.date=2001&rft.degree=Hovedoppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-5493en_US
dc.type.documentHovedoppgaveen_US
dc.identifier.duo5049en_US
dc.contributor.supervisorFinn Førsunden_US
dc.identifier.bibsys020186258en_US


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

No file.

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata