Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2013-03-12T09:53:21Z
dc.date.available2013-03-12T09:53:21Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.date.submitted2002-10-01en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/17329
dc.description.abstractIn an important paper, Fuhrer and Moore (1995) showed that Taylor (1980)’s staggered wage setting model does not exhibit persistence in inflation; they proposed a simple modification, in which workers cared about the real wages of other workers, which solves this problem. However, we argue that the key part of Fuhrer and Moore’s model is not that workers care about the real wages of other workers, but that workers are assumed to care about the past real wages of other workers. When that assumption is replaced by the assumption that workers care about current real wages of other workers, the Fuhrer and Moore model reverts identically to the Taylor model. We also show that a simple model in which workers care about their own past real wages, e.g. because unemployment insurance depends on past wages, as noted in Blanchard and Katz (1999), generates negative autocorrelations in inflation.nor
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUniversitetet i Oslo, Økonomisk institutt
dc.relation.ispartofMemorandum fra Økonomisk institutt, Universitetet i Oslo http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-7118en_US
dc.relation.urihttp://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-7118
dc.subjectinflasjon pengepolitikk pengevesen Inflation persistenceen_US
dc.titleA note on inflation persistenceen_US
dc.typeWorking paperen_US
dc.date.updated2012-09-14en_US
dc.creator.authorHolden, Steinaren_US
dc.creator.authorDriscoll, John C.en_US
dc.subject.nsiVDP::210en_US
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:no-3134en_US
dc.type.documentArbeidsnotaten_US
dc.identifier.duo4865en_US
dc.identifier.bibsys021689210en_US
dc.identifier.fulltextFulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/17329/1/4865.pdf


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata