Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2024-06-28T15:08:02Z
dc.date.available2024-06-28T15:08:02Z
dc.date.created2024-05-02T09:55:39Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationSaplacan, Diana van Otterdijk, Marieke Tørresen, Jim . Qualitative Observational Video-Based Study on Perceived Privacy in Social Robots’ Based on Robots Appearances. Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO). 2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/111346
dc.description.abstractPrivacy has recently got attention, especially since the introduction of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in Europe, the new Artificial Intelligence Act (AIA) and the new Machinery Regulation. Privacy can be defined as someone’s right to keep personal matters, including personal life, personal information, or relationships, to themselves. A social robot’s appearance (=the combination of embodiment and motion) may contribute to how human users perceive them, including how these robots are perceived in relation to privacy. If these robots are part of certain services such as home- or healthcare, these may also have consequences on how these services are perceived. This study aims at showcasing the users’ perception of privacy based on the perceived robot’s appearance. Three social robots were chosen for this purpose: PLEO (with a zoomorphic appearance), Pepper (with a childlike anthropomorphic appearance), and TIAGo (with a mechanical and asymmetrical appearance). The data was collected through an in-lab observational video-based study from 50 participants with very limited- or no experience with robots. Our findings show that PLEO was perceived as preserving most of the users' privacy, while Pepper was perceived as more privacy-invasive than PLEO but less than TIAGo. TIAGo was perceived as hard to interpret in terms of privacy. Our findings also point out that designing robots with a cute appearance, such as PLEO, may contribute to participants trusting the robot more and thus being willing to share their data. The paper provides a list of characteristics that participants associated with a social robot as preserving or not their privacy. Further, the paper discusses the appearance of these social robots in terms of “cuteness” as a dark pattern in the design of social robots that may lead to data myopia, but also the possible consequences this may have, for vulnerable users, while trying to design more inclusive robots.
dc.description.abstractQualitative Observational Video-Based Study on Perceived Privacy in Social Robots’ Based on Robots Appearances
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers
dc.titleQualitative Observational Video-Based Study on Perceived Privacy in Social Robots’ Based on Robots Appearances
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishQualitative Observational Video-Based Study on Perceived Privacy in Social Robots’ Based on Robots Appearances
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorSaplacan, Diana
dc.creator.authorvan Otterdijk, Marieke
dc.creator.authorTørresen, Jim
cristin.unitcode185,15,5,46
cristin.unitnameForskningsgruppe for robotikk og intelligente systemer
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2265911
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2024
dc.identifier.jtitleAdvanced Robotics and its Social Impacts (ARSO)
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1109/ARSO60199.2024.10557941
dc.subject.nviVDP::Annen informasjonsteknologi: 559
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2162-7568
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion
dc.relation.projectNFR/288285
dc.relation.projectNFR/312333
dc.relation.projectNFR/262762


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata