Skjul metadata

dc.date.accessioned2024-03-25T17:44:15Z
dc.date.available2024-03-25T17:44:15Z
dc.date.created2023-12-08T11:12:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationChaibi, Aleksander Allen-Unhammer, Anna Jane Vøllestad, Nina Køpke Russell, Michael Bjørn . Chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for acute neck pain: A 4-arm clinical placebo randomized controlled trial. A prospective study protocol. PLOS ONE. 2023, 18(12)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/110126
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Neck pain poses enormous individual and societal costs worldwide. Spinal manipulative therapy and Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug treatment are frequently used despite a lack of compelling efficacy data. This protocol describes a multicentre 4-arm, clinical placebo randomized controlled trial (RCT), investigating the efficacy of chiropractic spinal manipulative therapy (CSMT) versus sham CSMT, ibuprofen, and placebo medicine for acute neck pain. This superiority study will employ parallel groups, featuring a 1:1:1:1 allocation ratio. Material and methods We will randomize 320 participants equally into four groups: CSMT, sham CSMT, ibuprofen, or placebo medicine. CSMT groups are single-blinded, while the medicine groups are double-blinded. Data will be collected at baseline (Day 0), during treatment and post-treatment. The primary endpoint will assess the difference in mean pain intensity from Day 0 to Day 14 on a numeric rating scale 0–10; the CSMT group is compared to sham CSMT, ibuprofen, and placebo medicine groups, respectively. Secondary endpoints will assess mean pain intensity and mean duration at different time points, and adverse events, blinding success, and treatment satisfaction, including comparison between ibuprofen and placebo medicine. Power calculation is based on a mean neck pain rating of 5 at Day 0, with standard deviation of 1 in all groups. Mean pain reduction at Day 14 is expected to be 60% in the CSMT group, 40% in sham CSMT and ibuprofen groups, and 20% in the placebo medicine group. A linear mixed model will compare the mean values for groups with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. P values below 0.017 will be considered statistically significant. All analyses will be conducted blinded from group allocation. Discussion This RCT aims towards the highest research standards possible for manual-therapy RCTs owing to its two placebo arms. If CSMT and/or ibuprofen proves to be effective, it will provide evidence-based support for CSMT and/or ibuprofen for acute neck pain.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherPLOS
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleChiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for acute neck pain: A 4-arm clinical placebo randomized controlled trial. A prospective study protocol
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishChiropractic spinal manipulative therapy for acute neck pain: A 4-arm clinical placebo randomized controlled trial. A prospective study protocol
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorChaibi, Aleksander
dc.creator.authorAllen-Unhammer, Anna Jane
dc.creator.authorVøllestad, Nina Køpke
dc.creator.authorRussell, Michael Bjørn
cristin.unitcode185,52,10,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for tverrfaglig helsevitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2210927
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=PLOS ONE&rft.volume=18&rft.spage=&rft.date=2023
dc.identifier.jtitlePLOS ONE
dc.identifier.volume18
dc.identifier.issue12
dc.identifier.pagecount17
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0295115
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1932-6203
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide0295115


Tilhørende fil(er)

Finnes i følgende samling

Skjul metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
Dette verket har følgende lisens: Attribution 4.0 International