Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2024-03-17T17:40:12Z
dc.date.available2024-03-17T17:40:12Z
dc.date.created2024-01-10T11:58:07Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPeters, Steffie Tran-Gia, Johannes Agius, Sam Ivashchenko, Oleksandra V. Badel, Jean Noël Cremonesi, Marta Kurth, Jens Gabiña, Pablo Minguez Richetta, Elisa Gleisner, Katarina Sjögreen Tipping, Jill Bardiès, Manuel Stokke, Caroline . Implementation of dosimetry for molecular radiotherapy; results from a European survey. Physica Medica. 2023, 117
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/109722
dc.description.abstractPurpose The use of molecular radiotherapy (MRT) has been rapidly evolving over the last years. The aim of this study was to assess the current implementation of dosimetry for MRTs in Europe. Methods A web-based questionnaire was open for treating centres between April and June 2022, and focused on 2020–2022. Questions addressed the application of 16 different MRTs, the availability and involvement of medical physicists, software used, quality assurance, as well as the target regions for dosimetry, whether treatment planning and/or verification were performed, and the dosimetric methods used. Results A total of 173 responses suitable for analysis was received from centres performing MRT, geographically distributed over 27 European countries. Of these, 146 centres (84 %) indicated to perform some form of dosimetry, and 97 % of these centres had a medical physicist available and almost always involved in dosimetry. The most common MRTs were 131I-based treatments for thyroid diseases and thyroid cancer, and [223Ra]RaCl2 for bone metastases. The implementation of dosimetry varied widely between therapies, from almost all centres performing dosimetry-based planning for microsphere treatments to none for some of the less common treatments (like 32P sodium-phosphate for myeloproliferative disease and [89Sr]SrCl2 for bone metastases). Conclusions Over the last years, implementation of dosimetry, both for pre-therapeutic treatment planning and post-therapy absorbed dose verification, increased for several treatments, especially for microsphere treatments. For other treatments that have moved from research to clinical routine, the use of dosimetry decreased in recent years. However, there are still large differences both across and within countries.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleImplementation of dosimetry for molecular radiotherapy; results from a European survey
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishImplementation of dosimetry for molecular radiotherapy; results from a European survey
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorPeters, Steffie
dc.creator.authorTran-Gia, Johannes
dc.creator.authorAgius, Sam
dc.creator.authorIvashchenko, Oleksandra V.
dc.creator.authorBadel, Jean Noël
dc.creator.authorCremonesi, Marta
dc.creator.authorKurth, Jens
dc.creator.authorGabiña, Pablo Minguez
dc.creator.authorRichetta, Elisa
dc.creator.authorGleisner, Katarina Sjögreen
dc.creator.authorTipping, Jill
dc.creator.authorBardiès, Manuel
dc.creator.authorStokke, Caroline
cristin.unitcode185,15,4,50
cristin.unitnameBiofysikk og medisinsk fysikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2223816
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Physica Medica&rft.volume=117&rft.spage=&rft.date=2023
dc.identifier.jtitlePhysica Medica
dc.identifier.volume117
dc.identifier.pagecount0
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.103196
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1120-1797
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleid103196


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International