Grzegorczyk and Whitehead Points: The Story Continues

dc.date.accessioned	2024-03-13T10:31:57Z
dc.date.available	2024-03-13T10:31:57Z
dc.date.created	2024-02-16T13:58:16Z
dc.date.issued	2024
dc.identifier.citation	Jockwich, Daniel Santiago Gruszczyński, Rafał . Grzegorczyk and Whitehead Points: The Story Continues. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 2024
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10852/109517
dc.description.abstract	The paper is devoted to the analysis of two seminal definitions of points within the region-based framework: one by Whitehead (1929) and the other by Grzegorczyk (Synthese, 12(2-3), 228-235 1960). Relying on the work of Biacino & Gerla (Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 37(3), 431-439 1996), we improve their results, solve some open problems concerning the mutual relationship between Whitehead and Grzegorczyk points, and put forward open problems for future investigation.
dc.language	EN
dc.rights	Attribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.title	Grzegorczyk and Whitehead Points: The Story Continues
dc.title.alternative	ENEngelskEnglishGrzegorczyk and Whitehead Points: The Story Continues
dc.type	Journal article
dc.creator.author	Jockwich, Daniel Santiago
dc.creator.author	Gruszczyński, Rafał
cristin.unitcode	185,14,33,0
cristin.unitname	Institutt for filosofi, idé- og kunsthistorie og klassiske språk
cristin.ispublished	true
cristin.fulltext	original
cristin.qualitycode	2
dc.identifier.cristin	2246920
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitation	info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Journal of Philosophical Logic&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2024
dc.identifier.jtitle	Journal of Philosophical Logic
dc.identifier.doi	https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09747-6
dc.type.document	Tidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewed	Peer reviewed
dc.source.issn	0022-3611
dc.type.version	AcceptedVersion