Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T18:03:21Z
dc.date.available2024-02-26T18:03:21Z
dc.date.created2023-09-05T10:54:33Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationSagen, Joachim Støren Smedslund, Geir Simonsen, Ann Elisabeth Habberstad, Andreas Hanssønn Kjeken, Ingvild Dagfinrud, Hanne Moe, Rikke Helene . Patient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review. BMJ Open Quality. 2023, 12(2)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/108620
dc.description.abstractBackground Patient engagement (PE) is required to improve future healthcare services. PE in the development and delivery of healthcare services is likely to be complex but is scarcely described. Objectives The objective of this scoping review was to summarise primary studies on mesolevel PE regarding structure, process and outcomes. More specifically, the aim was to explore barriers and facilitators to successful PE, how persons are engaged in the process and summarise reported consequences. Method A systematic scoping review was conducted, searching the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane and PsycINFO databases. Primary studies, published between 7 July 2005 and 4 October 2022, were considered for inclusion. Two reviewers extracted data about PE (eg, attributes of PE settings, facilitators and barriers, and outcomes to PE) and the first author coded the extracted data into structural, processual and outcome themes. Results Of 8588 identified records, 37 studies were eligible. Most of the included studies were conducted in Europe (n=19; 51%) and North America (n=13; 35%). Structures that ensure sufficient stakeholder representativeness and PE knowledge through education may facilitate the PE process further, regardless of the environmental setting. Interpersonal relationships with uneven power dynamics were reported as noteworthy processual barriers to meaningful PE, while clearly described roles and tasks were reported as important facilitators. In contrast to hard outcomes with operationalised PE effects, the most noteworthy outcomes of PE were reported as soft processual consequences such as patient representatives improving their self-esteem and feeling valued. Conclusions Unfortunately, there is a dearth of studies exploring hard and operationalised PE outcomes on healthcare services and patients receiving healthcare. The PE process may be facilitated by dedicated finances to PE education and by ensuring sufficient stakeholder representativeness.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group Limited
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titlePatient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishPatient engagement in the development and delivery of healthcare services: a systematic scoping review
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorSagen, Joachim Støren
dc.creator.authorSmedslund, Geir
dc.creator.authorSimonsen, Ann Elisabeth
dc.creator.authorHabberstad, Andreas Hanssønn
dc.creator.authorKjeken, Ingvild
dc.creator.authorDagfinrud, Hanne
dc.creator.authorMoe, Rikke Helene
cristin.unitcode185,52,10,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for tverrfaglig helsevitenskap
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2172428
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=BMJ Open Quality&rft.volume=12&rft.spage=&rft.date=2023
dc.identifier.jtitleBMJ Open Quality
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pagecount11
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2023-002309
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2399-6641
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleide002309
dc.relation.projectNFR/328657


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International