Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2024-02-14T08:04:28Z
dc.date.available2024-02-14T08:04:28Z
dc.date.created2022-08-29T11:22:29Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationAreia, Miguel Mori, Yuichi Correale, Loredana Repici, Alessandro Bretthauer, Michael Sharma, Prateek Taveira, Filipe Spadaccini, Marco Antonelli, Giulio Ebigbo, Alanna Kudo, Shin-ei Arribas, Julia Barua, Ishita Kamiński, Michał Filip Messmann, Helmut Rex, Douglas K Dinis-Ribeiro, Mário Hassan, Cesare . Cost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study. The Lancet Digital Health. 2022, 4(6), e436-e444
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/108019
dc.description.abstractBackground Artificial intelligence (AI) tools increase detection of precancerous polyps during colonoscopy and might contribute to long-term colorectal cancer prevention. The aim of the study was to investigate the incremental effect of the implementation of AI detection tools in screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, and the cost-effectiveness of such tools. Methods We conducted Markov model microsimulation of using colonoscopy with and without AI for colorectal cancer screening for individuals at average risk (no personal or family history of colorectal cancer, adenomas, inflammatory bowel disease, or hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome). We ran the microsimulation in a hypothetical cohort of 100 000 individuals in the USA aged 50–100 years. The primary analysis investigated screening colonoscopy with versus without AI every 10 years starting at age 50 years and finishing at age 80 years, with follow-up until age 100 years, assuming 60% screening population uptake. In secondary analyses, we modelled once-in-life screening colonoscopy at age 65 years in adults aged 50–79 years at average risk for colorectal cancer. Post-polypectomy surveillance followed the simplified current guideline. Costs of AI tools and cost for downstream treatment of screening detected disease were estimated with 3% annual discount rates. The main outcome measures included the incremental effect of AI-assisted colonoscopy versus standard (no-AI) colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality, and cost-effectiveness of screening projected for the average risk screening US population. Findings In the primary analyses, compared with no screening, the relative reduction of colorectal cancer incidence with screening colonoscopy without AI tools was 44·2% and with screening colonoscopy with AI tools was 48·9% (4·8% incremental gain). Compared with no screening, the relative reduction in colorectal cancer mortality with screening colonoscopy with no AI was 48·7% and with screening colonoscopy with AI was 52·3% (3·6% incremental gain). AI detection tools decreased the discounted costs per screened individual from $3400 to $3343 (a saving of $57 per individual). Results were similar in the secondary analyses modelling once-in-life colonoscopy. At the US population level, the implementation of AI detection during screening colonoscopy resulted in yearly additional prevention of 7194 colorectal cancer cases and 2089 related deaths, and a yearly saving of US$290 million. Interpretation Our findings suggest that implementation of AI detection tools in screening colonoscopy is a cost-saving strategy to further prevent colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Funding European Commission and Japan Society of Promotion of Science.
dc.description.abstractCost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleCost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishCost-effectiveness of artificial intelligence for screening colonoscopy: a modelling study
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorAreia, Miguel
dc.creator.authorMori, Yuichi
dc.creator.authorCorreale, Loredana
dc.creator.authorRepici, Alessandro
dc.creator.authorBretthauer, Michael
dc.creator.authorSharma, Prateek
dc.creator.authorTaveira, Filipe
dc.creator.authorSpadaccini, Marco
dc.creator.authorAntonelli, Giulio
dc.creator.authorEbigbo, Alanna
dc.creator.authorKudo, Shin-ei
dc.creator.authorArribas, Julia
dc.creator.authorBarua, Ishita
dc.creator.authorKamiński, Michał Filip
dc.creator.authorMessmann, Helmut
dc.creator.authorRex, Douglas K
dc.creator.authorDinis-Ribeiro, Mário
dc.creator.authorHassan, Cesare
cristin.unitcode185,52,11,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for helseledelse og helseøkonomi
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2046634
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=The Lancet Digital Health&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=e436&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.jtitleThe Lancet Digital Health
dc.identifier.volume4
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.startpagee436
dc.identifier.endpagee444
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(22)00042-5
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn2589-7500
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
dc.relation.projectEC/H2020 101026196


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International