Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T18:00:12Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T18:00:12Z
dc.date.created2023-08-08T15:27:01Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationLindemann, Kristina Yvonne Kathe Danbolt, Svana Ramberg, Lene Kristine Marsby Eyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur Wang, Yun Heli-Haugestøl, Anne Gjertine Walcott, Sara Mjåland, Odd Navestad, Gerd Hermanrud, Silje Juul-Hansen, Knut Erling Bragstad, Line Kildal Opheim, Randi Kleppe, Andreas Kongsgaard, Ulf Erik . Patient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 2023, 33(8), 1287-1294
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/107773
dc.description.abstractObjectives This study aimed to analyze the adherence to strategies to prevent post-operative nausea and vomiting after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynae-oncology patients. Patient-reported nausea before and after ERAS was also studied. Methods This prospective observational study included all patients undergoing laparotomy for a suspicious pelvic mass or confirmed advanced ovarian cancer before (pre-ERAS) and after the implementation of ERAS (post-ERAS) at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Patients were a priori stratified according to the planned extent of surgery into two cohorts (Cohort 1: Surgery of advanced disease; Cohort 2: Surgery for a suspicious pelvic tumor). Clinical data including baseline characteristics and outcome data were prospectively collected. Results A total of 439 patients were included, 243 pre-ERAS and 196 post-ERAS. At baseline, 27% of the patients reported any grade of nausea. In the post-ERAS cohort, statistically significantly more patients received double post-operative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis (64% pre-ERAS vs 84% post-ERAS, p<0.0001). There was no difference in the need for rescue medication (82% pre-ERAS vs 79% post-ERAS; p=0.17) and no statistically significant difference between pre- and post-ERAS or between the surgical cohorts in patient-reported nausea of any grade on day 2. Patients who reported none/mild nausea on day 2 had significantly less peri-operative fluid administered during surgery than those who reported moderate or severe nausea (median 12.5 mL/kg/hour vs 16.5 mL/kg/hour, p=0.045) but, in multivariable analysis, fluid management did not remain significantly associated with nausea. Conclusion Implementation of an ERAS protocol increased the adherence to post-operative nausea and vomiting prevention guidelines. Nausea, both before and after laparotomy, remains an unmet clinical need of gynae-oncology patients also in an ERAS program. Patient-reported outcome measures warrant further investigation in the evaluation of ERAS.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.titlePatient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishPatient-reported nausea after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for gynae-oncology patients
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorLindemann, Kristina Yvonne Kathe
dc.creator.authorDanbolt, Svana
dc.creator.authorRamberg, Lene Kristine Marsby
dc.creator.authorEyjólfsdóttir, Brynhildur
dc.creator.authorWang, Yun
dc.creator.authorHeli-Haugestøl, Anne Gjertine
dc.creator.authorWalcott, Sara
dc.creator.authorMjåland, Odd
dc.creator.authorNavestad, Gerd
dc.creator.authorHermanrud, Silje
dc.creator.authorJuul-Hansen, Knut Erling
dc.creator.authorBragstad, Line Kildal
dc.creator.authorOpheim, Randi
dc.creator.authorKleppe, Andreas
dc.creator.authorKongsgaard, Ulf Erik
cristin.unitcode185,53,49,14
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for gynekologisk kreft
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2165696
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International Journal of Gynecological Cancer&rft.volume=33&rft.spage=1287&rft.date=2023
dc.identifier.jtitleInternational Journal of Gynecological Cancer
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.startpage1287
dc.identifier.endpage1294
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2023-004356
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn1048-891X
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International