dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-19T16:34:10Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-19T16:34:10Z | |
dc.date.created | 2023-09-05T11:36:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Galtung, Kristina Flor Lauritzen, Peter Mæhre Sandbæk, Gunnar Bay, Dag Ponzi, Erica Baco, Eduard Cowan, Nigel C. Naas, Anca Michaela Rud, Erik . Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison. European Urology Open Science. 2023, 55, 1-10 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/106488 | |
dc.description.abstract | Background
There is uncertainty about the utility of multiphase computed tomography (CT) compared with single-phase CT in the routine examination of patients with visible haematuria (VH).
Objective
To compare the accuracies of single nephrographic phase (NP) CT and four-phase CT in detecting urothelial carcinoma (UC).
Design, setting, and participants
This was a single-centre, prospective, paired, noninferiority study of patients with painless VH referred for CT before cystoscopy between September 2019 and June 2021. Patients were followed up for 1 yr to ascertain UC diagnosis.
Intervention
All patients underwent four-phase CT (control), from which single NP CT (experimental) was extracted. Both were independently assessed for UC.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis
The primary outcome was the difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT using a 7.5% noninferiority limit. Histologically verified UC defined a positive reference standard. Secondary outcomes included differences in sensitivity, specificity, negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values, and area under the curve (AUC). All results are reported per patient.
Results and limitations
Of the 308 patients included, UC was diagnosed in 45 (14.6%). The difference in accuracy between the control and experimental CT was 1.9% (95% confidence interval −2.8 to 6.7), demonstrating noninferiority. Sensitivity was 93.3% versus 91.1%, specificity was 83.7% versus 81.8%, NPV was 98.7% versus 98.2%, PPV was 49.4% versus 46.1%, and AUC was 0.96 versus 0.94 for the control versus experimental CT. Limitations included a low number of UC cases and no definite criteria for selecting a noninferiority limit.
Conclusions
The accuracy of NP CT is not inferior to that of four-phase CT for detecting UC.
Patient summary
This study shows that a computed tomography (CT) examination with only one contrast phase is no worse than a more complex CT examination for detecting cancer in the urinary tract among patients presenting with visible blood in the urine. | |
dc.language | EN | |
dc.rights | Attribution 4.0 International | |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | |
dc.title | Is a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison | |
dc.title.alternative | ENEngelskEnglishIs a Single Nephrographic Phase Computed Tomography Sufficient for Detecting Urothelial Carcinoma in Patients with Visible Haematuria? A Prospective Paired Noninferiority Comparison | |
dc.type | Journal article | |
dc.creator.author | Galtung, Kristina Flor | |
dc.creator.author | Lauritzen, Peter Mæhre | |
dc.creator.author | Sandbæk, Gunnar | |
dc.creator.author | Bay, Dag | |
dc.creator.author | Ponzi, Erica | |
dc.creator.author | Baco, Eduard | |
dc.creator.author | Cowan, Nigel C. | |
dc.creator.author | Naas, Anca Michaela | |
dc.creator.author | Rud, Erik | |
cristin.unitcode | 185,53,63,10 | |
cristin.unitname | Avdeling for radiologi-nukleærmedisin | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 2172459 | |
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitation | info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=European Urology Open Science&rft.volume=55&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2023 | |
dc.identifier.jtitle | European Urology Open Science | |
dc.identifier.volume | 55 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 10 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2023.06.005 | |
dc.type.document | Tidsskriftartikkel | |
dc.type.peerreviewed | Peer reviewed | |
dc.source.issn | 2666-1691 | |
dc.type.version | PublishedVersion | |