Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-09-15T16:39:19Z
dc.date.available2023-09-15T16:39:19Z
dc.date.created2023-09-01T14:18:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBrilenkov, Maksym Fornazier, K.S.F. Hergt, L.T. Hoerning, G.A. Marins, A. Murokoshi, T. Rahman, F. Stutzer, Nils-Ole Zhou, Y. Abdalla, F.B. Andersen, Kristian Joten Aurvik, Ragnhild Banerji, Ranajoy Basyrov, Artem Battista, A. Bersanelli, M. Bertocco, S. Bollanos, S. Colombo, L.P.L. Eriksen, Hans Kristian Kamfjord Eskilt, Johannes Røsok Foss, Marie Kristine Franceschet, C. Fuskeland, Unni Galeotta, S. Galloway, Mathew Gerakakis, S. Gjerløw, Eirik Hensley, B. Herman, Daniel Christopher Hoang, T.D. Ieronymaki, M. Ihle, Håvard Tveit Jewell, J.B. Karakci, Ata Keihänen, Elina Keskitalo, R. Maggio, G. Maino, D. Maris, M. Paradiso, S. Partridge, B. Reinecke, M. Suur-Uski, A.-S. Svalheim, Trygve Leithe Tavagnacco, D. Thommesen, Harald Tomasi, M. Watts, Duncan Wehus, Ingunn Kathrine Zacchei, A. . BeyondPlanck: IV. Simulations and validation. Astronomy and Astrophysics (A & A). 2023, 675
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/105054
dc.description.abstractEnd-to-end simulations play a key role in the analysis of any high-sensitivity cosmic microwave background (CMB) experiment, providing high-fidelity systematic error propagation capabilities that are unmatched by any other means. In this paper, we address an important issue regarding such simulations, namely, how to define the inputs in terms of sky model and instrument parameters. These may either be taken as a constrained realization derived from the data or as a random realization independent from the data. We refer to these as posterior and prior simulations, respectively. We show that the two options lead to significantly different correlation structures, as prior simulations (contrary to posterior simulations) effectively include cosmic variance, but they exclude realization-specific correlations from non-linear degeneracies. Consequently, they quantify fundamentally different types of uncertainties. We argue that as a result, they also have different and complementary scientific uses, even if this dichotomy is not absolute. In particular, posterior simulations are in general more convenient for parameter estimation studies, while prior simulations are generally more convenient for model testing. Before B EYOND P LANCK , most pipelines used a mix of constrained and random inputs and applied the same hybrid simulations for all applications, even though the statistical justification for this is not always evident. B EYOND P LANCK represents the first end-to-end CMB simulation framework that is able to generate both types of simulations and these new capabilities have brought this topic to the forefront. The B EYOND P LANCK posterior simulations and their uses are described extensively in a suite of companion papers. In this work, we consider one important applications of the corresponding prior simulations, namely, code validation. Specifically, we generated a set of one-year LFI 30 GHz prior simulations with known inputs and we used these to validate the core low-level B EYOND P LANCK algorithms dealing with gain estimation, correlated noise estimation, and mapmaking.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleBeyondPlanck: IV. Simulations and validation
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishBeyondPlanck: IV. Simulations and validation
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorBrilenkov, Maksym
dc.creator.authorFornazier, K.S.F.
dc.creator.authorHergt, L.T.
dc.creator.authorHoerning, G.A.
dc.creator.authorMarins, A.
dc.creator.authorMurokoshi, T.
dc.creator.authorRahman, F.
dc.creator.authorStutzer, Nils-Ole
dc.creator.authorZhou, Y.
dc.creator.authorAbdalla, F.B.
dc.creator.authorAndersen, Kristian Joten
dc.creator.authorAurvik, Ragnhild
dc.creator.authorBanerji, Ranajoy
dc.creator.authorBasyrov, Artem
dc.creator.authorBattista, A.
dc.creator.authorBersanelli, M.
dc.creator.authorBertocco, S.
dc.creator.authorBollanos, S.
dc.creator.authorColombo, L.P.L.
dc.creator.authorEriksen, Hans Kristian Kamfjord
dc.creator.authorEskilt, Johannes Røsok
dc.creator.authorFoss, Marie Kristine
dc.creator.authorFranceschet, C.
dc.creator.authorFuskeland, Unni
dc.creator.authorGaleotta, S.
dc.creator.authorGalloway, Mathew
dc.creator.authorGerakakis, S.
dc.creator.authorGjerløw, Eirik
dc.creator.authorHensley, B.
dc.creator.authorHerman, Daniel Christopher
dc.creator.authorHoang, T.D.
dc.creator.authorIeronymaki, M.
dc.creator.authorIhle, Håvard Tveit
dc.creator.authorJewell, J.B.
dc.creator.authorKarakci, Ata
dc.creator.authorKeihänen, Elina
dc.creator.authorKeskitalo, R.
dc.creator.authorMaggio, G.
dc.creator.authorMaino, D.
dc.creator.authorMaris, M.
dc.creator.authorParadiso, S.
dc.creator.authorPartridge, B.
dc.creator.authorReinecke, M.
dc.creator.authorSuur-Uski, A.-S.
dc.creator.authorSvalheim, Trygve Leithe
dc.creator.authorTavagnacco, D.
dc.creator.authorThommesen, Harald
dc.creator.authorTomasi, M.
dc.creator.authorWatts, Duncan
dc.creator.authorWehus, Ingunn Kathrine
dc.creator.authorZacchei, A.
cristin.unitcode185,15,3,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for teoretisk astrofysikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin2171704
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Astronomy and Astrophysics (A & A)&rft.volume=675&rft.spage=&rft.date=2023
dc.identifier.jtitleAstronomy and Astrophysics (A & A)
dc.identifier.volume675
dc.identifier.pagecount15
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244958
dc.subject.nviVDP::Astrofysikk, astronomi: 438
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0004-6361
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion
cristin.articleidA4


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International