| dc.date.accessioned | 2023-07-19T10:40:09Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2023-07-19T10:40:09Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/102758 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Migration policy is among the most politicized ans disruptive issue in modern democracies. This thesis focuses on decision-making processes behind EU migration policies in light of recent crisis, looking at the period 2015-2022. This period covers three significant shocks that vary in scope, from a few thousand migrants on the border to several million migrants in Europe, and that have been met with different policy responses from the EU and from individual Member States. The comparative perspective this allows provides an opportunity to examine what conditions lead to different policy responses. Through case studies, this thesis explores the roles of the European Commission (hereafter Commission) as the main propenent of common EU mirgration policies, and the Visegrád group (consisting of Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and the Czech Republic) as the main opponent. This thesis adresses the research question: In times of migration crises, what determines the extent to which EU migration policies are characterized by internal coordination or by externalization? | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.relation.haspart | Article 1: Karin Vaagland. Parochialism as driver of non-cooperation: the case of the static position of Poland on EU migration policy. To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing. | |
| dc.relation.haspart | Article 2: Karin Vaagland. The importance of being in good standing: Why the Visegrád group contributes to the external dimension of EU migration policy. To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing. | |
| dc.relation.haspart | Article 3: Karin Vaagland (2021). Crisis‐Induced Leadership: Exploring the Role of the EU Commission in the EU–Jordan Compact. Politics and Governance, 2021, 9(3), 52–62. doi: 10.17645/pag.v9i3.4080. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4080 | |
| dc.relation.haspart | Article 4: Karin Vaagland (2023). How strategies of refugee host states are perceived by donor states: EU interpretations of Jordanian migration diplomacy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 49:12, 3085-3100. doi: 10.1080/1369183X.2023.2193715. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2193715 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i3.4080 | |
| dc.relation.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2193715 | |
| dc.title | To harmonize or to externalize? EU decision-making in times of migration crises | en_US |
| dc.type | Doctoral thesis | en_US |
| dc.creator.author | Vaagland, Karin | |
| dc.type.document | Doktoravhandling | en_US |