Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-07-13T10:48:06Z
dc.date.available2023-07-13T10:48:06Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.isbn978-82-348-0209-6
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/102730
dc.description.abstractPressure injury is a serious complication after spinal cord injury, and the occurrence is high during the acute care rehabilitation at the spinal cord unit, as well as after discharge back home to the municipality. Health services where the spinal cord unit and the caregivers in the municipalities cooperate, is necessary to optimize the follow-up. The aims of this thesis were to to assess the prevalence of pressure injury and to identify risk factors for pressure injury during acute rehabilitation after a spinal cord injury, by reviewing medical records. Further aims were to assess health related quality of life, healing, satisfaction and cost-utility in a randomized controlled trial among persons with spinal cord injury, where one group received traditional outpatient follow-up, and the other received remote videoconference follow-up in addition to traditional outpatient care. Self-report questionnaires and custom-made assessment scales were used. The occurrence of pressure injury in the population was 16%, and identified risk factors were the completeness of the spinal cord injury, bowel and bladder dysfunction, comorbidity, e.g. diabetes mellitus type 1 and depression, as well as drug abuse. The results in the randomized controlled trial showed no significant differences in health related quality of life, healing, experienced satisfaction, safety or patient-empowerment between the two groups. The cost-utility analysis showed that additional videoconference follow-up was more costly, but also a bit more effective than traditional follow-up. Overall, pressure injury is a serious problem among people with spinal cord injury, and videoconference follow-up seems to be a safe remote treatment option for people with spinal cord injury and pressure ulcer.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.haspartPaper I. Irgens I, Hoff JM, Jelnes R, Alexander M, Stanghelle JK, Thoresen M, Rekand T. Spinal cord injury and development of pressure ulcers during acute rehabilitation in Norway; a retrospective multi-center study. Spinal Cord 2020;58:069–1079. doi: 10.1038/s41393-020-0465-z. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0465-z
dc.relation.haspartPaper II. Irgens I, Midelfart-Hoff J, Jelnes R, Alexander M, Stanghelle JK, Thoresen M, Rekand T. Videoconferencing in pressure injury: results from a randomized controlled telemedicine trial in patients with spinal cord injury. JMIR Form Res 2022;6(2):e27692. doi: 10.2196/27692. The article is included in the thesis. Also available at: https://doi.org/10.2196/27692
dc.relation.haspartPaper III. Irgens I, Kleven L, Hoff JM, Jelnes R, Alexander M, Stanghelle JK, Rekand T. Cost-utility analysis and environmental outcome of videoconference in pressure injury. A randomized controlled trial in individuals with spinal cord injury. Submitted. To be published. The paper is not available in DUO awaiting publishing.
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41393-020-0465-z
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.2196/27692
dc.titleVideoconferencing for Follow-Up of Pressure Injury: Period Prevalence, Risks, Treatment and Financial Consequencesen_US
dc.typeDoctoral thesisen_US
dc.creator.authorIrgens, Ingebjørg
dc.type.documentDoktoravhandlingen_US


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata