Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-03-18T17:05:16Z
dc.date.available2024-02-24T23:46:00Z
dc.date.created2023-02-24T16:03:02Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationPoulsen, Mads Protopapas, Athanassios Juul, Holger . How RAN stimulus type and repetition affect RAN’s relation with decoding efficiency and reading comprehension. Reading and writing. 2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/101620
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study investigated how correlations between rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading depend on characteristics of the stimuli. RAN tasks using stimuli with high phonological demands were predicted to be the strongest correlates of decoding efficiency, while high semantic demands were predicted to lead to stronger correlations with comprehension. Method: At two time points, 132 Grade 2 children completed four different RAN versions, two using letter stimuli (low semantic load) and two using object stimuli (high semantic load). Both types of stimuli were used in either a repeated version, where a set of four items were repeated multiple times (low semantic load), or in a unique version, where each item appeared only once (high semantic load). Decoding efficiency and reading comprehension were assessed in Grade 5. Results: Analyses showed that confirmatory factor models with separate factors for each version provided better fit than grouping factors according to time point. Repetition (lowering semantic load) increased the longitudinal association between RAN objects and decoding efficiency. There was a tendency for conditions with higher semantic load to correlate more strongly with reading comprehension after control for decoding efficiency, but the differences were not significant. Conclusion: The results indicate that increasing semantic load weakens the relationship with decoding efficiency.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherKluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
dc.titleHow RAN stimulus type and repetition affect RAN’s relation with decoding efficiency and reading comprehension
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishHow RAN stimulus type and repetition affect RAN’s relation with decoding efficiency and reading comprehension
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorPoulsen, Mads
dc.creator.authorProtopapas, Athanassios
dc.creator.authorJuul, Holger
cristin.unitcode185,18,3,0
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for spesialpedagogikk
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode2
dc.identifier.cristin2129123
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Reading and writing&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2023
dc.identifier.jtitleReading and writing
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10421-7
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0922-4777
dc.type.versionAcceptedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata