Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-03-16T13:03:17Z
dc.date.available2023-03-16T13:03:17Z
dc.date.created2023-02-13T13:44:51Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationLarsen, Camilla Kjellstad Galli, Elena Duchenne, Jürgen Aalen, John Stokke, Caroline Fjeld, Jan Gunnar Degtiarova, Ganna Claus, Piet Gheysens, Olivier Saberniak, Jørg Sirnes, Per Anton Lyseggen, Erik Bogaert, Jan Kongsgaard, Erik Penicka, Martin Voigt, Jens-Uwe Donal, Erwan Hopp, Einar Smiseth, Otto Armin . Scar imaging in the dyssynchronous left ventricle: Accuracy of myocardial metabolism by positron emission tomography and function by echocardiographic strain. International Journal of Cardiology. 2022, 372, 122-129
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/101513
dc.description.abstractPurpose Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is reduced in patients with high left ventricular (LV) scar burden, in particular when scar is located in the LV lateral wall or septum. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) can identity scar, but is not feasible in all patients. This study investigates if myocardial metabolism by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) and contractile function by echocardiographic strain are alternatives to LGE-CMR. Methods In a prospective multicenter study, 132 CRT candidates (91% with left bundle branch block) were studied by speckle tracking strain echocardiography, and 53 of these by FDG-PET. Regional myocardial FDG metabolism and peak systolic strain were compared to LGE-CMR as reference method. Results Reduced FDG metabolism (<70% relative) precisely identified transmural scars (≥50% of myocardial volume) in the LV lateral wall, with area under the curve (AUC) 0.96 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.90–1.00). Reduced contractile function by strain identified transmural scars in the LV lateral wall with only moderate accuracy (AUC = 0.77, CI 0.71–0.84). However, absolute peak systolic strain >10% could rule out transmural scar with high sensitivity (80%) and high negative predictive value (96%). Neither FDG-PET nor strain identified septal scars (for both, AUC < 0.80). Conclusions In CRT candidates, FDG-PET is an excellent alternative to LGE-CMR to identify scar in the LV lateral wall. Furthermore, preserved strain in the LV lateral wall has good accuracy to rule out transmural scar. None of the modalities can identify septal scar.
dc.languageEN
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleScar imaging in the dyssynchronous left ventricle: Accuracy of myocardial metabolism by positron emission tomography and function by echocardiographic strain
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishScar imaging in the dyssynchronous left ventricle: Accuracy of myocardial metabolism by positron emission tomography and function by echocardiographic strain
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorLarsen, Camilla Kjellstad
dc.creator.authorGalli, Elena
dc.creator.authorDuchenne, Jürgen
dc.creator.authorAalen, John
dc.creator.authorStokke, Caroline
dc.creator.authorFjeld, Jan Gunnar
dc.creator.authorDegtiarova, Ganna
dc.creator.authorClaus, Piet
dc.creator.authorGheysens, Olivier
dc.creator.authorSaberniak, Jørg
dc.creator.authorSirnes, Per Anton
dc.creator.authorLyseggen, Erik
dc.creator.authorBogaert, Jan
dc.creator.authorKongsgaard, Erik
dc.creator.authorPenicka, Martin
dc.creator.authorVoigt, Jens-Uwe
dc.creator.authorDonal, Erwan
dc.creator.authorHopp, Einar
dc.creator.authorSmiseth, Otto Armin
cristin.unitcode185,53,15,14
cristin.unitnameInstitutt for kirurgisk forskning
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2125632
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=International Journal of Cardiology&rft.volume=372&rft.spage=122&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.jtitleInternational Journal of Cardiology
dc.identifier.volume372
dc.identifier.startpage122
dc.identifier.endpage129
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.11.042
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0167-5273
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International