Hide metadata

dc.date.accessioned2023-03-10T17:44:17Z
dc.date.available2023-03-10T17:44:17Z
dc.date.created2022-12-21T13:16:04Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBitenc, Marie Tune, Benedicte Grebstad Melheim, Maria Atneosen-Åsegg, Monica Lai, Xiaoran Rajar, Polona Solberg, Rønnaug Baumbusch, Lars Oliver . Assessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia. Molecular Biology Reports. 2022
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10852/101219
dc.description.abstractAbstract Background Since the discovery more than half a century ago, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) has become an attractive objective in multiple diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring settings. However, despite the increasing number of cfDNA applications in liquid biopsies, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of the nature of cfDNA including optimal assessment. In the presented study, we continued testing and validation of common techniques for cfDNA extraction and quantification (qRT-PCR or droplet digital PCR) of nuclear- and mitochondrial cfDNA (ncfDNA and mtcfDNA) in blood, using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia to determine potential temporal and quantitative changes at the levels of cfDNA. Methods and Results Newborn piglets (n = 19) were either exposed to hypoxia (n = 11) or were part of the sham-operated control group (n = 8). Blood samples were collected at baseline (= start) and at the end of hypoxia or at 40–45 min for the sham-operated control group. Applying the qRT-PCR method, ncfDNA concentrations in piglets exposed to hypoxia revealed an increasing trend from 7.1 ng/ml to 9.5 ng/ml for HK2 (hexokinase 2) and from 4.6 ng/ml to 7.9 ng/ml for β-globulin, respectively, whereas the control animals showed a more balanced profile. Furthermore, median levels of mtcfDNA were much higher in comparison to ncfDNA, but without significant differences between intervention versus the control group. Conclusions Both, qRT-PCR and the droplet digital PCR technique identified overall similar patterns for the concentration changes of cfDNA; but, the more sensitive digital PCR methodology might be required to identify minimal responses.
dc.languageEN
dc.publisherKluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleAssessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
dc.title.alternativeENEngelskEnglishAssessing nuclear versus mitochondrial cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by qRT-PCR and droplet digital PCR using a piglet model of perinatal asphyxia
dc.typeJournal article
dc.creator.authorBitenc, Marie
dc.creator.authorTune, Benedicte Grebstad
dc.creator.authorMelheim, Maria
dc.creator.authorAtneosen-Åsegg, Monica
dc.creator.authorLai, Xiaoran
dc.creator.authorRajar, Polona
dc.creator.authorSolberg, Rønnaug
dc.creator.authorBaumbusch, Lars Oliver
cristin.unitcode185,53,46,11
cristin.unitnamePediatrisk forskningsinstitutt
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1
dc.identifier.cristin2096335
dc.identifier.bibliographiccitationinfo:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Molecular Biology Reports&rft.volume=&rft.spage=&rft.date=2022
dc.identifier.jtitleMolecular Biology Reports
dc.identifier.volume50
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.startpage1533
dc.identifier.endpage1544
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s11033-022-08135-0
dc.type.documentTidsskriftartikkel
dc.type.peerreviewedPeer reviewed
dc.source.issn0301-4851
dc.type.versionPublishedVersion


Files in this item

Appears in the following Collection

Hide metadata

Attribution 4.0 International
This item's license is: Attribution 4.0 International